Best Selling HDTVs

July 30, 2008

How Much More Efficient Are 2008 Plasma TV's Compared To Those From 2005?

008_vampire_energy.jpgYesterday we pointed you to a GOOD magazine article that fingered plasma TV's as being energy hogs even when in standby mode. In fact the article stated that the average plasma set would tack on about $160 annually to your electric bill, just from standby energy consumption. These numbers were compiled in 2005 and plasma models have become a great deal more energy-efficient since then, but Ben Drawbaugh from Engadget HD still thought $160 was a little high. So he measured the standby energy draw on a 60-inch Pioneer plasma and found it to be only 20 Watts. When all the math is said and done that works out to about $20 per year. That's a huge difference and while GOOD mag's calculations could be off, we wonder if plasma TV's in 2005 really sucked up that much energy?

Read More in: Plasma

Share this Article with others: social bookmarking

Related Articles:

Came straight to this page? Visit TV Snob for all the latest news.

Posted by Justin Davey at July 30, 2008 2:00 AM

Recent Comments

I think they are more efficient, but not that much more.

I think they just got their numbers wrong. There numbers seem to be based on 160 Watts. That is just an insane amount of energy to draw at standby.

Posted by: Ben Drawbaugh at July 30, 2008 8:33 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please enter the letter "v" in the field below:
Please press Post only once. Submission of comments takes up to 20 seconds because of Spam Filtering.
Steals & Deals
See all of the TV Snob Steals and Deals

Join the Mailing List Mailing List
Enter your Email

Powered by FeedBlitz
Subscribe - RSS

facebook_badge.jpg twitter_badge.jpg

Site Navigation

Visit our other properties at!



This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered by
Movable Type 6.3.6
All items Copyright © 1999-2017 Blogpire Productions. Please read our Disclaimer and Privacy Policy